Beyond art’s threshold:

From Disclosure to Love

GAMcCullough

 

 

“No man is an island entire of itself…”

Although this was penned by J Donne in the 1600s, in a larger sense, he was describing our current reality. All reality being relational, it is co-structured through multi-layered and overlapping reciprocal relationships.¹

The environmental conditions that make such relationships possible are argued by Peters, in The Marvelous Clouds, as being Media. His concept is much larger then that of media as simple technologies of communication.² In that broader sense, these reciprocal relationships themselves may be understood as media—not as objects standing between beings, but as the ongoing processes through which beings mutually disclose, transform, and co-emerge. In essence, Media are reciprocal relations through which beings affect, co-constitute and disclose each other and reality.³

Unfortunately though, as Boorstin shows, media begets media.4 Every additional layer moving one further and further from direct engagement. What had once begun as living reciprocity, submerges into a habitual background of unnoticed transparency. Accelerated by utility, transaction and technological mediation, spontaneous reciprocity is no longer co-aligned and becomes neglected in dis-orientation and distraction. 5

This ‘inevitable’ patina of transparency over reciprocal relations means it is incumbent upon us to realize Art’s value as that of restoring attention to these obscured relationships.6 In a very meaningful sense, art is a renaissance, a (re)entry for one into the relational processes.7

Art, though a renewal, is inherently incomplete, and intentionally unfinished. Only by moving beyond this threshold, may the viewer complete art’s promise. If after its revelation, if the viewer remains only at the level of this new awareness, then art has stumbled.

But, where does this threshold lead to? How ought one now live with this awareness and so fulfill art’s momentum? Can one avoid the neglect or noise of transparency from reoccurring? The remedy is found in the type and degree of engagement the viewer may sustain going forward.

This engaged participation is something one practices, it isn’t something one possesses.⁸ The practice of reciprocity fosters emergent meanings and being that neither participant could generate in quite the same way alone.⁹ It’s practice is metamorphosing.¹⁰ As, this co-mediation is open ended, it must be voluntary.

This must be a choice, since the further one moves along the axis of engagement, the more one’s vulnerability to entanglement and change increases. One may reduce this risk by limiting participation to detached observation, but then the result would be restricted to an expansion of knowledge alone. From greater reciprocal openness and appreciative engagement, emerges greater co-transformation and understanding.¹¹

In this regard, the deepest and most sustained insight is most apt to emerge from learning to live within reciprocity.¹² Hence, one may argue that the most significant among the modes of possible engagement, is that from which an open attending to reciprocal relationship operates. There one finds the fullest answer to ‘What practice will help preserve reciprocity in a world that constantly tends toward transparency, utility, and objectification?’.

Attending is the engagement that is fully grounded in the capacity to participate in meaningful, reciprocal, adaptive relationships. Sustained attending moves beyond the cognitive. Deepened by reciprocity, participation then becomes less an act of observation and leans into mutual presence.

Art may disclose a transparent reality, but continued dwelling without reserve within the reality disclosed is where art’s momentum moves one towards. At its fullest expression, this reciprocal attending revives and sustains meaning and being. This mutual fulfillment is what we traditionally call Love.¹³ Love constantly interrupts habitual possession and restores both participants to reciprocal relations.

Clearly, Art is a catalyst, not an end. Beyond its’ threshold, without Love, Art risks becoming contemplation alone. While Love without disclosure risks becoming sentiment untethered from reality.¹⁴

______________

 

Footnotes *

1. John Donne, Devotions upon Emergent Occasions (London, 1624), Meditation XVII: "No man is an island entire of itself..." The passage has become a classic expression of the interdependence of human existence.

2. John Durham Peters, The Marvelous Clouds: Toward a Philosophy of Elemental Media (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015). Peters enlarges the concept of media beyond communication technologies to include the environmental conditions through which beings encounter one another.

3. Although Peters does not define reciprocity itself as media, this essay extends his elemental conception by proposing reciprocal relations as the primary mediating processes through which beings mutually disclose and co-constitute one another.

4. Daniel J. Boorstin, The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America (New York: Harper & Row, 1961). Boorstin argues that successive layers of representation increasingly replace direct experience with mediated experience.

5. The notion of transparency employed here follows a phenomenological sense in which practices, technologies, and relationships recede from conscious awareness precisely because they function successfully within everyday life.

6. The claim that art restores perception echoes the phenomenological tradition in which artworks interrupt habitual perception and disclose dimensions of the world otherwise overlooked.

7. Martin Heidegger, ‘The Origin of the Work of Art’, in Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. Albert Hofstadter (New York: Harper & Row, 1971). Heidegger argues that genuine artworks unconceal aspects of Being rather than merely represent objects.

8. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, "Eye and Mind," in The Primacy of Perception (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964). Merleau-Ponty describes perception as participatory rather than detached observation.

9. The understanding of emergence used throughout this essay is relational rather than computational IE: new meanings arise through reciprocal participation and cannot be wholly reduced to the intentions of either participant.

10. The distinction between knowledge acquired through observation and understanding arising through participation parallels themes developed in philosophical hermeneutics, particularly the claim that understanding transforms the interpreter as much as the interpreted.

11. Martin Buber, I and Thou, trans. Walter Kaufmann (New York: Scribner, 1970). Buber's distinction between I–It and I–Thou relationships provides an important philosophical resonance for the essay's account of reciprocal presence.

12. Simone Weil, Waiting for God (New York: Harper & Row, 1951). Weil famously characterizes attention as the rarest and purest form of generosity, a conception that informs the discussion of sustained attending.

13. The present essay intentionally employs the word Love phenomenologically rather than sentimentally. Love is understood as the sustained practice of dwelling within reciprocal disclosure rather than as an emotion alone.

14. The concluding distinction between Art and Love is not intended as opposition. Rather, art initiates disclosure while love sustains participation within what has been disclosed.

 

 

Resonances *

The reflections and ideas developed above arise within a wider ecology of thoughts. The writers listed below are offered as orienting authors rather than as direct sources. They elucidate neighbouring conversations whose concerns resonate with those explored in this essay.

 

Media and Environment

John Durham Peters : elemental media & environmental mediation

Marshall McLuhan : media as extensions and environments

Daniel J. Boorstin : mediation and pseudo-events

Phenomenology

Martin Heidegger : unconcealment (*aletheia*)

Maurice Merleau-Ponty : embodied perception

Hans-Georg Gadamer : understanding as participation

Reciprocity

Martin Buber : I–Thou encounter

Alfred North Whitehead : relational process

Tim Ingold : correspondence and dwelling

Attention

Simone Weil :attention as generosity

Iris Murdoch : moral attention and unselfing

Love

Bell Hooks : love as an active practice

Erich Fromm : love as disciplined participation

Thomas Merton : contemplative presence

 

 

* Footnotes & Resonances generated by free chatgpt 2026